Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chemical Reaction (artscene group) (2nd nomination)
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. –Juliancolton | Talk 00:51, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Chemical Reaction (artscene group) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No indication of notability, only primary source info. Basically a dozen people who hang out on EFnet and occasionally make ascii art. ˉˉanetode╦╩ 00:01, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - No sources found for this group after a relatively exhaustive search, therefore notability cannot be established. In a previous AfD, the creator of the article asserted that the group was in fact notable, but reliable sources would be hard to come by because this art form happened exclusively outside the coverage of the mainstream media. If these artists took such great pains to keep their work out of the mainstream media, then I doubt they would want to see a WP article about themselves. WP's definition of notability requires independent, third-party, verifiable references. If something took place on Earth that did not get covered by such a source, then it is not notable by WP's definition, and does not deserve an article. If a tree falls in a forest and no one is around, does it make a sound? SnottyWong talk 00:29, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete -- no coverage in reliable sources, no article. Andrea105 (talk) 00:38, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:46, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.