Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Turori

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MER-C 19:50, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Chris Turori

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Player does not qualify for WP:NRU (Major League Rugby is not a notable league under WP:NRU), only brief mentions and news of him signing for sides so doesn't qualify for WP:GNG either. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 16:18, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 17:13, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 17:13, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Rugby union-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 17:13, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Seems to me to meet WP:GNG, as at least one source is “substantial coverage”, viz. an article about Turori and not a brief mention. Moonraker (talk) 07:24, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Don't believe any of the sources on the page or that I can find are 'substantial coverage', that are independent of the source/tournament. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 10:53, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Moonraker, as has been discussed here can you show which of the sources in the article provide enough significant coverage for it to pass WP:GNG or if there are other sources that you believe enough to allow it to pass WP:GNG can you provide them. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 15:39, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:52, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – Does not meet WP:GNG; general WP:ROUTINE transaction coverage with very little depth outlining his previous clubs. He is capped in a lower level national team, but I can find no evidence he has appeared in any notable tournaments, or even with the team in any official matches. The closest source to meeting GNG is this in The San Diego Union-Tribune, but it is pretty basic and not enough to push this over the "multiple independent sources of significant depth" of GNG; it is mostly just an interview. Yosemiter (talk) 16:46, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I agree with Yosemiter above Spiderone 11:55, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG, none of the coverage is either independent or significant. SportingFlyer T·C 18:06, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.