Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chuvash statehood

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Chuvashia. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:05, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Chuvash statehood

Nominated for speedy due to "original research". That didn't seem like a good reason for a speedy, so I AfD it. No vote. Ryan Delaney ^talk 09:33, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Chuvashia. The article is rambling, unfocussed, unreferenced and written in broken English. I have a suspicion of lack of neutrality, some sort of WP:POINT is made regarding to centuries of oppression and now independence, due to actions taken by mainly two tribes only. Earlier article version contained the word "genocide" - indicative of lack of WP:NPOV. The history section may contain salvageable information, but unfortunately I have no clue whatsoever regarding factual accuracy. I propose that it is redirected to Chuvashia to preserve edit history and contents, and that a note is placed at the target, to mine and merge any salvagable information. Power.corrupts (talk) 14:53, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect. The topic is undoubtedly encyclopedic and worthy of coverage, but the article in its present state fails miserably to reach that goal. Unless the article is re-written during the course of this AfD, it should be redirected to Chuvashia.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 15:48, May 26, 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.