Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Concrete (student newspaper)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 09:17, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Concrete (student newspaper)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

These two articles appear to be about the same subject, and also the newspaper fails the notability guidelines. GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 14:50, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:33, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:33, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:33, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:37, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Multiple awards received from and covered by The Independent and The Guardian constitutes at least minimum evidence of notability. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 01:20, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Student media awards are not major distinctions. Is there a parent article to which this sourced content can be merged? czar 07:30, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The closest I can see is List of student newspapers in the United Kingdom and, at the risk of running headlong into WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, a large number of those have their own articles with little more in the way of sourcing than this. I would think if this is deleted, then a multi-AfD for those would be then appropriate. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 02:20, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- RoySmith (talk) 23:54, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 00:39, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Student newspaper content is generally appropriate in an article about the school: in this case, merging to a new subsection of University of East Anglia#Student life might be the most appropriate thing to do if editors don't find a separate article to be warranted. --Arxiloxos (talk) 00:49, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep. I am inclined to agree with Eggishorn and keep this article, but it would be helpful if there was only one article. I propose merging Concrete – UEA's Independent Student Newspaper to Concrete (student newspaper) as the latter is the one linked from the University's page. Would it be appropriate to do the merge while the AfD is still open? There is no need to merge the talk pages as only the target has anything other than a Project banner which is on both. --Bduke (Discussion) 01:07, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:08, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.