Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Jorgensen (musician)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Owl City. (non-admin closure) TBr and ley ^{(what's up)} 02:34, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Jorgensen (musician)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a notable musician, in a nutshell. I had redirected the page to Owl City, but the article, such as it was, was restored. Note that there's nothing but YouTube and MySpace and such among the references. I searched earlier today and found nothing at all on the internets. Also, no label, no record deal, no nothing. Drmies (talk) 22:43, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Drmies Daniel hasnt got a Record Deal,no label because he's an unsigned artist.Ive been a fan for 4 years and many times ive been asked "who's daniel jorgensen" and for fans who know do know who he is,this can get a bit annoying.Our solution was to make a wiki page to make him more notable among Owl City fans.He is currently a member of the Owl City live band and has been since 2009. Watchers3 (talk) 10:38, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This page shouldn't be deleted. Because fans of Owl City, like me, want to find out more about the live band. It doesn't matter if he doesn't have a label, he's an up and coming artist. He is also releasing a brand new album soon, under one of his solo projects: Carinthia. There is much more to him than just being a member of Owl City, and I am sure in the future he will become more popular. So, that's why I'm asking you, Drmies to not delete this page. I hope you will consider this, sincerely, HeroOfWiki (talk) 10:59, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Drmies, Not all of these people who ask are friends, and we do have more reliable sources which we have yet to source, as the page is still a work in progress and we are putting together our sources. It'd be nice to give us some time as we've both, only started using wikipedia to contribute, and we don't know very much coding, so we're taking our time. It'd be nice if you could give us an actual chance to try and complete this project, as we're doing it in-between school, and live in different countries, therefore making it difficult to communicate as often as we possibly can. If you need more "reliable" sources, please wait as we are trying our best to put this page together. Thank you for your consideration and understanding. (Felt this needed to be put onto the discussion page instead of my own talk page.) Mydarlingblue (talk) 19:53, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I don't think this should be deleted. There's not much we know about Daniel and I am quite happy when someone works on such a thing. Kind Regards, UmbrellaOwl from Tumblr. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.134.76.138 (talk) 12:03, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 15:45, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Austria-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 15:45, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 15:45, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I don't think this page should be deleted because it would help a lot of people know more about Daniel. I think it's finally great that someone decided to make a wiki page about him. I think you should give it a chance to grow and provide more information. Best regards, itsalonganddarkdecember from Tumblr. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.39.78.11 (talk) 19:18, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this page should not be deleted. A lot of people, and fans, would find this page very helpful if only you would give it a chance to be improved. Please consider. From theintrovertedcat. 180.193.130.231 (talk) 03:13, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This page was very informative to me and definitely should not be deleted. Upon hearing that there's a member of Owl City who makes beautiful Austria-inspired music, I searched around only to be disappointed due to the lack of response I got. However, when some brilliant people made this entry, I was highly thankful as I now know about all of his works, and I then went on to itunes and bought a lot of his work. If you really think Daniel is not, as you put it, a 'Notable Musician', search him on itunes and then see what you think. Thank you for your consideration. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.160.121.233 (talk) 05:17, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wanted to mention that I am currently researching Daniel on google, and there is over 2 million results. Currently on page 54 of my google search, and I've found a lot of information I didn't even know about before. Mydarlingblue (talk) 07:54, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I do not think that this should be deleted. 71.254.10.188 (talk) 19:45, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Owl City. The sourcing in the article consist primarily of unreliable sources. I cannot find any coverage to indicate that he meets the general inlusion guidelines for a standalone article, nor is there evidence to that those specific to musicians are met. -- Whpq (talk) 20:19, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Owl City. Sourcing in the article and from searches is primary, social media, unreliable, or trivial mentions. May achieve sufficient notability in time, but appears to be well under the threshold now. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 04:23, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:35, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect As per the others, I feel this should be redirected to Owl City. On a short note, I feel the above IP's are different computers used by the creator of the article. Wiki4 Blog 06:11, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I suppose we've come to accept that it will be redirected. Thank you for at least having a discussion about it rather than just doing it out of the blue without any kind warning. Also, to Wiki4Blog, the above IP's are most certainly not from Watchers3 and I, they are actually from various Hoot Owls all over the globe who have either, 1. Met Daniel, or 2. Know of Daniel. I know you're probably not going to take my word for it, but do you honestly think a UNI student and a high school student have the time to find 6 other computers, let alone over thirty others to rate the article? We posted about this article to Twitter, Facebook, and Tumblr, reaching out to a couple thousand people from various different countries around the world, and this is what we got back. I'm sorry if you don't believe me, but that's the truth. Mydarlingblue (talk) 17:23, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.