Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Murray (rugby league) (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 06:01, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Murray (rugby league)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:RLN as he has not yet made his professional debut. PROD was contested without reason by article creator. – skemcraig⊗ 01:12, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Has not played in the two professional leagues in England. He has played in the semi-professional League One, but the prevision revision of RLN did not support that as grounds for article creation, nor does the current iteration.Fleets (talk) 07:44, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Are Bradford not a professional club? I have made a comment on the talk page for WP:RLN as it would seem that now more clubs are professional in the Championship that a player who is in that competition should be notable. I imagine all the Hull KR players have pages, but would those who play for Rochdale? Surely someone who has played many games in the Championship is more notable than someone who has made a single appearance in the early round of the Challenge Cup. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chocolatebareater (talk • contribs) 18:48, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Professional debut for a pro club in a pro league.Fleets (talk) 20:10, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As WP:RLN currently stands, playing for a pro club in the Championship still fails. – skemcraig⊗ 20:19, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A compromise would be to get the stakeholder, ie the article creator, to properly source the article and thus remove any other steps for others like pulling together a comprehensive RLN proposal revision in a day, or requesting the editor who nominated it to close down the nomination.Fleets (talk) 20:42, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An easy delete; poorly formatted, very poorly sourced and the player has not (yet?) done anything notable. Mattlore (talk) 21:31, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails WP:RLN and WP:GNG. J Mo 101 (talk) 22:13, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:RLN; Bradford's professional status is irrelevant, the fact is that they don't play in the Super League. Number 5 7 22:18, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Professional player playing for a professional team. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chocolatebareater (talk • contribs) 15:29, 28 February 2017 (UTC) — Note to closing admin: Chocolatebareater (talk • contribs) is the creator of the page that is the subject of this XfD. [reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 09:36, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 10:51, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.