Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dave Westlake

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 13:43, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dave Westlake

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete, as last I checked, candidates are generally not considered notable. Irbisgreif (talk) 20:41, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, per nom. Fails WP:Politician and WP:GNG.--TParis00ap (talk) 20:43, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per TParis00ap. Also note no news coverage. Melchoir (talk) 20:56, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, Fails WP:Politician. Looks like the SPA account that created it is here only to promote their candidate. Toddst1 (talk) 21:49, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the information and links, I understand your POV - I have no objection to a deletion at this time. WIgopConservative (talk) 04:56, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've put it up for speedy under G7. Irbisgreif (talk) 13:35, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

While the author may not be against deletion, I wouldn't take that as a deletion request, so I've decided to decline the G7. Best, JamieS93 ^{be kind to newcomers} 18:39, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:POLITICIAN. Niteshift36 (talk) 09:38, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete too earlier, a Crystal Ball at this time. Royal broil 02:48, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.