Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Duke Ejiofor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No userfication in the absence of a target user. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 21:23, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Duke Ejiofor

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:NGRIDIRON or WP:GNG. power~enwiki (π, ν) 06:10, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

~~Keep~~ He's getting serious consideration for the NFL Draft and has several wake forest records, which is notability. http://www.nfl.com/draft/2018/profiles/duke-ejiofor?id=2559868. Kkuchnir (talk) 06:37, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Changed to Delete and userfy. If he gains notability through starting a game or other means, This is a starting point that would be beneficial to keep Kkuchnir (talk) 18:28, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 06:32, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of American football-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 06:32, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 06:32, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete although userfy may be a good option too. I see a good quality typical college player who has not yet achieved notability status for inclusion in this encyclopedia. That could change of course, and when it does we bring the article back. try another wiki? Appreciate the enthusiasm of the editor!--Paul McDonald (talk) 12:05, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete it is absurd enough that playing in just one NFL game gtives notability. However, since Ejiofor is well below that there is no sign of notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 06:12, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Other than this one feature story, I am not finding additional examples of significant coverage in reliable, independent sources. I agree with Paul M. that userfy would be a reasonable option so that the effort is not lost should he make it in the NFL. Cbl62 (talk) 10:46, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.