Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ear protectors

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Ear protection. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 23:51, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ear protectors

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Dictionary article Rathfelder (talk) 22:52, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Was originally created as a disambig page. I agree not a proper article...Pvmoutside (talk) 02:08, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to dab page Ear protection (created 2007, unedited since 2008). Note that Ear protection device exists as a redirect to Hearing#Protection, but this doesn't include the "protection from cold" aspect. PamD 08:51, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And also Ear defender redirects to Ear protectors, while Ear defenders redirects to Earmuffs. Fortunately, Ear muff and Earmuff both redirect to Earmuffs, and all sensible variations of Earplugs redirect to that article, so there is not complete chaos here. PamD 08:55, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:28, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:28, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect as this is completely applicable. SwisterTwister talk 06:30, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.