Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Element Skateboards

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The Nordic Goddess Kristen ^{Worship her} 00:04, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Element Skateboards

clearly an ad, runs afoul of at the very least WP:ADVERT and WP:N Aurush kazemini^talk 06:45, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete spamvertising. JBsupreme (talk) 07:58, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 11:08, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep after cleanup. Doesn't fall foul of WP:N because it's been described as "the world's leading skateboard company" by a leading daily newspaper, as clearly cited and linked in the article. Some phrases do fall foul of WP:NPOV and WP:ADVERT as it stands, but I think that could be solved by a little editing. I'll start that now.--S Marshall ^Talk/_Cont 13:04, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Significant enough company with sufficient coverage.--Michig (talk) 18:08, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The article is far from spam. It is referenced by a number of reliable sources, which I added earlier this month, that shows it notability. Cunard (talk) 21:07, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Notable. ChildofMidnight (talk) 23:17, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.