Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fire Cape
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Redirect to TzHaar Fight Cave, somewhat surreally. The Land 20:02, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Seriously, this is describing a single item in a single MMORPG. I don't know how else to describe it's lack of notability. Ricky81682 (talk) 07:29, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Runescapecruft. —Cryptic (talk) 07:35, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. We're getting a lot of these of late ... we need some notability policy on this. Daniel Case 07:41, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Unfortunately, I could probably point to a lot more. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 08:21, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge There's an article called TzHaar Fight Cave which features a lot about this cape already. Merge with that. J.J.Sagnella 08:42, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge as above and cleanup the resulting messy page. -- (aeropagitica) 15:05, 30 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Strong DeleteMerge with TzHaar Fight Cave and TzTok-Jad articles to create one article about different parts of one area in RuneScape. Create sections in the article for each subject - «ßØÛ®ßÖѧ3» Talk | Contrib's 17:26, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]- Redirect to TzHaar Fight Cave, since it appears to have already been merged into that page. -Colin Kimbrell 17:29, 1 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge - combine it with the TzHaar Fight Cave and TzTok-Jad articles. —the preceding unsigned comment is by Shadowdancer (talk • contribs) UTC 19:51, 1 January 2006(Sorry for forgetting to sign - Mike 02:44, 2 January 2006 (UTC))[reply]
- Merge - combine it with above mentioned articles and also add more information - I would do, but I am unsure as to where to put it - Seems pointless putting it on a to be deleted page. Philipwhiuk 16:33, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.