Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fuck the World (The Vines song)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Winning Days. has already been merged so ... Spartaz ^Humbug! 07:29, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fuck the World (The Vines song)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to be notable. Lachlanusername (talk) 09:57, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:51, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Dan arndt (talk) 03:12, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:05, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and redirect to Winning Days, the album it was released on. The material is worth keeping, but that article is short enough to digest what's on the song page. Meelar (talk) 17:21, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, causa sui (talk) 03:44, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and redirect, as said above. —Fitoschido ^[shout_{track] \\ 19 July, 2011 [12:34]}

Redirect to Winning Days. -- Whpq (talk) 14:43, 21 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The material from this article has apparently already been merged into Winning Days, and in the absence of anything independently notable about this song, there is IMO no reason for a redirect. Additionally, the edit history of the article doesn't appear sufficiently useful (a potential reason to keep a redirect, but not one that applies in this case). Richwales (talk · contribs) 04:44, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect. As Richwales says, it appears it has already been merged, but redirects are cheap and this is a plausible search term. Jenks24 (talk) 14:05, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.