Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gangubai Nivrutti Bhambure

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Gets there on the basic of GNG alone. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:57, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Gangubai Nivrutti Bhambure

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete: Fails WP:NPOL. Only claim to fame is she is the "oldest sarpanch" which is not a criteria for inclusion. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 10:51, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete non-notable local elected official.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:28, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:01, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Village officials would certainly not pass WP:NPOL but articles in India Times, India Today, and The Indian Express count to the WP:GNG.Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 04:11, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:22, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Absolutely. Well described by Eggishorn. I've double checked each source, and this qualifies on GNG. Lourdes 06:59, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk|c|em) 11:33, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk|c|em) 11:33, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - meets GNG Spiderone 14:42, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Lack notability. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 21:42, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sportsfan. Which ones of the multiple sources are you challenging? Lourdes 04:56, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.