Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ivaylo Vasilev
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 23:11, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Ivaylo Vasilev (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Recreation of an article deleted via PROD. The subject does not currently meet notability criteria in that he has not appeared in a top-tier league. Although he was signed by Levski Sofia, he has never played for them and is on loan to a B-Series team. From WP:NFOOTY "A player who signs for a domestic team but has not played in any games is not deemed to have participated in a competition, and is therefore not generally regarded as being notable" Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 15:23, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep It is just a matter of a month before the season starts and he plays in A group.He is a talented goalkeeper owned by Levski sofia.n Vidima Rakovski he will play regularly, so this page should stay! --added by Gandev88 (talk) 15:27, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment "He will play someday" is certainly not a valid argument for inclusion, and falls into WP:CRYSTAL. An article can be created after he meets the notability criteria, not in anticipation of him one day meeting the requirements outlined at WP:NFOOTY. --Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 17:10, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Given the proliferation of stubs about football players with single references to a sport's database, the guideline should be strictly interpreted. Ponyo accurately stated the proviso about non-playing players, and we should follow it. --Bejnar (talk) 16:49, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:52, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:53, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Article fails the general notability guideline and is about a footballer who hasn't played in a fully-pro league. Jogurney (talk) 02:20, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Article is about an athlete who fails his sport's notability guidelines. Xajaso (talk) 22:45, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - He has not played in a fully pro league, and he fails WP:GNG, and is therefore not notable enough to merit an article. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:40, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:41, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - fails WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG. GiantSnowman 16:49, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep
Hi,
He's played at two top clubs in Bulgaria. Youth when he did or not. This player is notable. He seems to be quite good at playing football. I beleive they are loaning him out like any other team would do to a young 20 year old that's not broken into the team yet-To get experience! In England Premier League clubs loan players out that haven't played a game for them yet. T o the Championship for example. Yes, I know thyat's a professional league but his parent club plays in a professional league. He still young-He will play for them soon. He's been on the subs bench a few times awell for them.
Thanks, pbl1998--Pbl1998 (talk) 17:39, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Read WP:CRYSTAL. If he becomes notable in future, then it can be restored Spiderone 11:35, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete- per nom Spiderone 13:43, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.