Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack chugg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. as an obvious hoax. Sarahj2107 (talk) 10:11, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jack chugg

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:GNG. I could not locate reliable sources for the claims being made in the article. If they can be located, he may be notable enough, but that remains to be seen. Comatmebro User talk:Comatmebro 19:53, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete as hoax - see Talk:Jack Chugg. PamD 00:30, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete hoax. If the claims in the article were true, online coverage in reliable sources would be abundant. I found nothing. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 03:02, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete - obvious hoax.Glendoremus (talk) 05:39, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.