Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Japanese family structure
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Consensus not reached. Keep. Enochlau 08:52, 3 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Original research and distinctly POV by a user who has created two pages (this and The effect of segregated education on negro school children), both now nominated (the other not by me); the user has made two other edits, both reverted, both replacing established content with similar essays. Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] (W) AfD? 17:46, 27 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Mark K. Bilbo 21:27, 27 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Jacqui★ 00:47, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- An encyclopedia article on Japanese families sounds fascinating. This ain't it. Delete. --Calton | Talk 01:20, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- I thought that, too. I spent a while trying to see if I could condense something usable out of the current content, but decided it was beyond me. If anyone can manage that I'll happily withdraw the nomination, as it's clearly a valid subject even if this treatment is pretty much irredeemable. - Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] (W) AfD? 10:48, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. -- Dalbury(Talk) 03:21, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. I made a quick sweep to remove some of the horribly non-encyclopedic text, condense and format -- its not the best start, but I think its an important article and some of the content can be salvaged. .:.Jareth.:. babelfish 16:56, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. I hope it's not a sin to vote and close at the same time, but the original problems of this article seem to have been addressed, and the editors above have noted that there are no objections to this particular subject being rendered in an encyclopedia. Enochlau 08:51, 3 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.