Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jasmine Sagginario

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:11, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Jasmine Sagginario

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Won a Radio Disney contest, released an EP on a non-notable label. Sources are entirely tied to the winning of the contest, with no further notability beyond that. Borderline case, probably, but I'm tempted to say she just fails WP:BAND. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 17:46, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 21:04, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This entry is an opinion on artist, however, shows no premise to delete Jasmine Sagginario as a music artist. The article above states she has released an EP on a non-notable label...The album was distributed through Sony/Provident. Please see provided link below:

http://www.providentmusic.com/pgs/artists.details.aspx?ArtistCode=JASM — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jasminepedia (talk • contribs) 21:20, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think I even need to say that the above editor is a COI SPA. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 20:03, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:20, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep - there is enough sourcing, good standard article.--BabbaQ (talk) 17:28, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

could you please define good standard? There is no way this article meets WP:GA. LibStar (talk) 13:46, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete does not meet WP:BAND. A number of sources in article are not reliable sources. Winning the disney contest comes under WP:BLP1E. LibStar (talk) 13:46, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Borderline keep references look ok, and with the release of the EP it is beyond one event. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 05:08, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ironholds (talk) 05:52, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - if people could provide full arguments, I (and, I'm sure, other admins) would be very grateful. Ironholds (talk) 05:52, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti^*poke* 07:16, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.