Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jelle Martens

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 22:56, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Jelle Martens

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:CREATIVE as far as I can see. No sources to speak of. Clarityfiend (talk) 19:39, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:42, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:44, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I see some weak blog-like coverage in a search. Nothing that approaches GNG.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 20:09, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not enough indepdent sources to pass GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 22:57, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I can find no significant coverage in independent, reliable sources or any other indication of notability; exhibitions, monographs, collections, etc. Vexations (talk) 22:40, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - The subject of this article does not pass WP:GNG or WP:NARTIST. Cannot find reliable sources online. Netherzone (talk) 23:47, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - just to be sure, I looked online and found insignificant coverage - a handful of news items in Dutch, and one passing mention in a book about collage. Bearian (talk) 18:07, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I couldn't find much about the subject. It also seems that "Jelle Martens" is a fairly common name, making it difficult to distinguish which sources are about this Jelle Martens and which ones are not. Gargleafg (talk) 01:22, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.