Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Johnny Washbrook
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Lack of significant coverage in independent reliable sources. RL0919 (talk) 17:51, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Johnny Washbrook (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The person's only major role is in one TV show, and the sources are either filmographies, related to the show, or in one case, his brother. A case for a redirect could be made, but this was made by a serial copyright violater, so it would make for deletion of the revision history. ミラP 16:00, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. ミラP 16:00, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. ミラP 16:00, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. ミラP 16:00, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. ミラP 16:00, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom. He only has a significant role in one show, and a handful of minor appearances in other ones. He hasn't made any standout contributions to entertainment, and, unless you count Billy's socks, doesn't have a cult following of any kind, thus failing WP:NACTOR.💵Money💵emoji💵Talk💸Help out at CCI! 13:29, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.