Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jrocknyc

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete, only keep votes were based on the condition of an extensive rewrite which hasn't happened. - Bobet 18:45, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jrocknyc

This was blanked and tagged [1] per XCD7. Dispute over this has arisen so I am AFDing this per procedure.Voice-of-All^T|@|ESP 01:26, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Royboy crashfan 02:08, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I argue that the jrocknyc entry be left up, as the site has been a long standing center of information for the jrock community. As wikipedia hosts several dozen japanese rock entries I feel the inclusion of a news source such as jrocknyc is necessary. *edit* Aye, registered now, not quite sure how to tag my name though, will figure that out soon.
- The above entry was left by unregistered user 24.131.1.147. -- Imban 04:59, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:WEB. savidan^{(talk) (e@)} 05:54, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unless sourced evidence of notability provided. I'd say the same for unsourced Japanese rock entries (or general music entries, for that matter) that can't establish basic notability. ~ Jeff Q (talk) 06:04, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep To be kept, it needs sources citing notability, and an extensive re-write and wikifying--Vercalos 06:51, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unless it is cleaned up very soon. —-- That Guy, From That Show! ^(talk) 2006-03-04 07:50Z
Weak Keep per Vercalos. --S iva1979^{Talk to me} 16:11, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no significant Google hits to indicate notability. Fagstein 19:55, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Jim62sch 20:18, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Does not meet WP:WEB criteria. OhNo itsJamie ^Talk 22:23, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.