Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Juanpa Zurita

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Szzuk (talk) 20:50, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Juanpa Zurita

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

After reading this erasure query in the Wikipedia in Spanish, I think it does not seem relevant to have the article of someone who has only won awards for having more followers in social networks, and their participation as an actor have been not very notable, not I'm a fan of him, nor do I follow him. Until now the only notable thing that I have seen that is will participate in the Luis Miguel series. Philip J Fry / talk 23:25, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: The spanish Wikipedia is another project that is governed by their own criteria. In Wikipedia in English it is valid according to the referents. I think the article needs more references and be improved, not destroyed. --Viajaste (talk) 01:18, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 11:34, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 11:34, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 11:34, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete My dude appears to be a person whose most notable aspect is making not very notable youtube videos. PeterTheFourth (talk) 11:12, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per notability and there actually are citations in most places. The citation needed tags in the lead are mostly false, as all but two of the topics in the lead are repeated and cited. This would make for a simple clean up. Zoom (talk page) 13:33, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I see no reason to delete it. We should just find ways to improve. --DatGuyonYouTube (talk) 13:43, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: The sources are not always a sustenance, because if that's why we can start creating articles from Instagram users with enough followers and YouTube users. We can not say that Juanpa Zurita is recognized for anything other than being Youtuber, he has not even made a significant record. All their awards are prizes based on their social networks. Is there anything more remarkable than that?.--Philip J Fry^talk 19:51, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: What? If you say that it is only YouTuber, it is because you have not read the article. I gonna give some reasons in bullet points:

30 under 30 from Forbes.
Model with different international brands, parades and events.
Movies, shorts and series (ok, as a secondary actor, but this is not a problem in Wikipedia)
International aid campaign
Conferences at Oxford, Harvard and guest at world conferences such as the World Economic Forum 2018. Ref WEF 2018
Creator of clothing company.
One of the most famous personalities in Mexico on the internet.
Icon of a television channel (MTV Latin America)
He is the co-author of a book --DatGuyonYouTube (talk)rita Ref

If you had read the article, you would see that YouTuber, in fact, is not his most important network/work. --Viajaste (talk) 22:59, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep for all these reasons. --Viajaste (talk) 23:08, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

*Keep - I see no reason to delete it. --DatGuyonYouTube (talk) 13:31, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@DatGuyonYouTube: You can't vote twice. PeterTheFourth (talk) 13:40, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@PeterTheFourth: Oh, I forgot I already voted. --DatGuyonYouTube (talk) 13:43, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep for the reasons listed above. The fact that he has attended "conferences at Oxford, Harvard and been a guest at world conferences such as the World Economic Forum 2018" means that he is definitely more noteworthy than an average YouTuber. Then with appearances in movies and TV shows, his clothing line, and his published works added on to that, it seems pretty conclusive that his article should be kept. Embryo Yall (talk) 08:39, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~ Winged Blades^Godric 03:26, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz ^Humbug! 18:23, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep notability is well established as noted above. FloridaArmy (talk) 12:02, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.