Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Julia Olteanu

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. east.718 at 02:24, 11/5/2007

Julia Olteanu

Contested speedy. One murder out of many. There's nothing special about it, yes there are six articles listed but none of them say anything more important than what is written in the English one (which is a Swedish newspaper too, just in English). You don't achieve encyclopedic relevance by getting murdered. Deleted on the Swedish Wikipedia. Saber^Excalibur! 07:31, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep servant only reason for nomination is that I did the article. I dont know if it is bad faith or not but i have a feeling it is,and i dont really feel interested in any discussion with the user either.--Zingostar 17:39, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment "You don't achieve encyclopedic relevance by getting murdered." Oh so you mean Laci Peterson,Shanda Sharer etc etc...didnt achieve that? ,your arguement is not correct servant and another arguement to vote against your nomination.--Zingostar 17:45, 30 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. WP:BLP says that, in general, people are not notable just because one event in which they were involved was reported in the news. Many, many people, unfortunately, have been murdered; we do not need articles about all of them, however, but only about those whose lives and deaths have some broader significance. It is not reasonable to compare Olteanu with Laci Peterson, whose death resulted in a widely controversial new US law, or as Shanda Sharer, whose death became the subject of two books, one of which was a New York Times bestseller. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:51, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per FisherQueen. One Night In Hackney₃₀₃ 21:55, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.