Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/La Trobe University Student Representative Council

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Wizardman 17:08, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

La Trobe University Student Representative Council

Non-notable organization. Has a few editors who won't even allow a notability tag to remain on the article. No sources, and has been tagged for them since December 2006. Fails WP:ORG. Paddy Simcox (talk) 22:12, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - all such student union bodies must have the secondary sources needed to meet WP:ORG. It hasn't, and doesn't. TerriersFan (talk) 22:37, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And what steps have you taken to find them that you can make such a sweeping statement? -- Mattinbgn\^talk 23:34, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as above XCharltonTilliDieX (talk) 23:51, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- Bduke (talk) 00:13, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment My suspicion is there is sufficient rich history of this organisation throughout the 1970s in particular that could make this entry notable. Verifiable secondary sources may end up being offline which would make the effort greater, but could well be worthwhile. Murtoa (talk) 04:55, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral More work could make this article meet WP:ORG. --Shark face 217 02:52, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the list of university deletions. —Noetic Sage 22:24, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep but cull - The organisation is probably notable (despite a total lack of sources), but just about everything is uncited and/or unencyclopaedic. So my vote would be to reduce the article to a stub until one of the regular editors can be bothered expanding the page in a helpful way. However if, as has been said above, the editors just keep reverting changes, a delete might be more appropriate. --Yeti Hunter (talk) 14:00, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep A significant student union involved in many political campaigns both inside and outside the university itself. A visit to the library would certainly find adequate sources for this article. -- Mattinbgn\^talk 23:34, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.