Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Life of the Mind
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 17:51, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Life of the Mind (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
This should be a slam-dunk deletion; I'm bothering to list it on AFD mainly for entertainment value. It's ridiculous, unreferenced, original research. I don't think there's a way to salvage it, nor do I see a similarity to an existing philosophy. Shalom (Hello • Peace) 03:01, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. Quick searchification turned up a book, an academic paper, and an academic project. --slakr\ talk / 03:24, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- CommentI'd like to point out that the paper and project don't seem to have anything to do with the article; they just share a common title. Not sure about the book, since there's not much information there. eaolson 03:37, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. This is a common phrase ("Adorno lived the life of the mind"), but isn't the proper subject of a wikipedia article (especially not as written here). Fireplace 03:56, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I think someone needs to get laid. Delete. humblefool® 04:29, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, but with protection... no reproduction, please. And put down that book. Mandsford 15:58, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete This is almost a speedy case. AntiVMan 04:43, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Agree with deletion - looks like someone's idea of a joke. I find their "Avoidance and destruction of any attractive attire (i.e. cool clothes)" especially silly. Computer not responding 05:49, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Fireplace. --Metropolitan90 07:39, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete soeems like an Uncylcopedic euphemism for nerd--Lenticel (talk) 23:55, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, no sources, original research at best. NawlinWiki 03:06, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.