Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Make It

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nja²⁴⁷ 08:48, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Make It

Non-notable promo single that didn't chart or win an award and lacks coverage in reliable sources. Only other appearance besides the album is Guitar Hero: Aerosmith, which is trivial. Disturbed Nerd 999 19:38, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following related page because it also doesn't assert notability (and is from the same album as "Make It"):

Delete both, fails notability per WP:MUSIC#Songs. No awards, no chart, no covers, no WP:RS. Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 00:54, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all: no significant coverage, non charting songs with no covers or awards, non-notable. JamesBurns (talk) 10:52, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note – This user has been blocked for sock puppetry and vote-stacking at AfDs. List of Confirmed sock puppets of User:JamesBurns Untick (talk) 14:02, 21 April 2009 (UTC) [reply]
Merge both to Aerosmith (album). They don't have any stand-alone notability but their appearance as songs in Guitar Hero: Aerosmith means that there is a likelihood that people will look for these songs and we should not leave them high and dry. -- Whpq (talk) 16:40, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

True, I guess a merge could work for them. That is if we can find enough verifiable information for the songs that isn't already in the album article.--Disturbed Nerd999 (Delete!) 20:01, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

For Make It, that shouldn't be too tough since it basically says it's on GH which isn't too hard to reference. Movin' Out makes a more extraordinary claim that it is the first song that Aerosmith wrote as a band. This article states this is the first song Tyler and Perry wrote together. And that was with a very brief search effort on my part. The description of the circumstances (sitting on the bed etc.) may be in some Aerosmith bio so it may be sourceable too although I'm not going to expand any effort on it unless the concensus is to merge. So in essence, we can merge the material to the album and even provide sourcing for that material. I don't see a good reason to delete given these circumstances. -- Whpq (talk) 20:16, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 01:35, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all per JamesBurns. Mergellus (talk) 11:18, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Why don't you believe a merge is appropriate? -- Whpq (talk) 12:46, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  - ...er "implausible search term"...? guess not. Merge then. Mergellus (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 12:56, 25 April 2009 (UTC).[reply]
    - I'm a bit suspicious about Mergellus, considering his initial !vote was deletion per JamesBurns, and JamesBurns had been blocked indefinitely earlier this week for sock puppetry and vote-stacking at AfDs. See also Mergellus' contribs, his first edits were related to an AfD about a song (Escape From Paris), so I highly doubt he's a new user.--DisturbedNerd999 (Delete!) 15:00, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      - I was thinking someone should step into the breach, as it were. Unfortunately I was unable to stay in character. Mergellus (talk) 17:09, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
        Note – This user (Mergellus) is a likely sock puppet of Hilary T and has been blocked indefinitely.--Disturbed Nerd999 (Delete!) 19:43, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.