Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Lovegrove

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 04:00, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

Mark Lovegrove

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Mark Lovegrove (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No significant coverage seems to exist for this person. The article has lots of sources, but they either mention him in name only or don't mention him at all, and many are completely unconnected to the statements in the article. The source for the award mentioned in the article is a DIY games site, and does not mention his name. Skeletor3000 (talk) 20:13, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Skeletor3000 (talk) 20:13, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Skeletor3000 (talk) 20:13, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Skeletor3000 (talk) 20:13, 8 January 2020 (UTC)

• Delete - no significant coverage from reliable sources. Current references are junk, to be blunt. Ping me please if you find real references. Bearian (talk) 01:01, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
• Delete Non-notable article. No [WP:SIGCOV|significant coverage]] from reliable sources, fails WP:GNG.  Spy-cicle💥  ^Talk? 16:40, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.