Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meningitis Trust

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Meningitis Now. czar 14:34, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Meningitis Trust

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 06:47, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Harsh (talk) 07:16, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 07:17, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 07:17, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

~~Delete - one peripheral mention in The Guardian is insufficient to convey notability.--Rpclod (talk) 14:20, 6 January 2018 (UTC)~~Merge and redirect to Meningitis Now. Hopefully some kind editor will add more authoritative references to the latter article.--Rpclod (talk) 13:18, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as failing WP:NONPROFIT. Tacyarg (talk) 17:14, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- I would say this easily meets WP:NONPROFIT. It was nationally well-known in the UK and is mentioned in hundreds of news articles according to Google. PriceDL (talk) 05:23, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect to Meningitis Now, a notable charity that it merged with. Meningitis Trust was well-known in the UK and remains a reasonable search term. Some news articles still use the old name. PriceDL (talk) 05:14, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect to Meningitis Now, with whom they merged in 2013. A supporting source has been added to target. Sam Sailor 08:39, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.