Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Paul Thomas

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Uncontested. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:02, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Paul Thomas

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Most of the references are to other Wikipedia articles (ie WP:CIRCULAR). Other references are not reliable or really don't discuss Thomas at all. Some are to book buying websites where you can purchase something Thomas wrote. Others are news articles that don't discuss Thomas at all, or in very little detail. The external links provide no additional evidence that this person is notable. Further search reveals nothing to show that the person meets either WP:GNG or WP:ANYBIO. Majora (talk) 23:09, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No evidence of notability. Some references don't mention him, others only just mention him, others are books by him rather than about him, others are Wikipedia articles. Also, the whole article is so promotional taht I think it would qualify for speedy deletion. The king of the sun (talk) 16:56, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 20:59, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 20:59, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 20:59, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as all of this, despite the apparent list of sources, is still questionable for his applicable independent notability. SwisterTwister talk 20:59, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.