Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nonpowered superheroes
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus, though given that the neutral opinions appear to me to be leaning towards delete, there should be no prejudice if the article is relisted fairly soon. --Sam Blanning(talk) 20:48, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I dunno. Is this a list people think is worth keeping? -- I don't. It's just a list in not particularly readable or useful format. KarenAnn 20:35, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Procedural note: Nominator, please list specific issues under Wikipedia:Deletion policy which you believe qualify this article for deletion. Thank you. Georgewilliamherbert 21:54, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Neutral This list seems somewhat crufty, but I've seen much worse. However, it should be moved to a name that reflects its listhood - for example, List of superheroes without superpowers. Zetawoof(ζ) 03:20, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- If kept, move as proposed by Zetawoof. This is of interest to comic fans and to people studying superhero/superpower ideas, but probably falls under "Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of trivia." Barno 02:27, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep/Rename, not a bad list. —Pengo 12:28, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:LC, no context or explanation why this list should be included in an encyclopedia. Stifle (talk) 18:16, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Neutral - I somewhat appreciate such a list and find it interesting, thought-provoking, and perhaps even "nifty"... but I'm not sure Wikipedia's the place for it. I'd say the only way to keep it would be to completely wikify it, which requires a -lot- of wikisearching and disambiguating. Has the author (Beerio) been notified? Perhaps s/he may be interesting in putting the work into it. Otherwise, it's kinda useless as it is... short of a conversation piece. אמר Steve Caruso (desk/poll) 17:40, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.