Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OddballPetz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. --MelanieN (talk) 23:36, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OddballPetz

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Completely non-notable video game mod. TKK! bark with me! 16:25, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 12:23, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:23, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I'd redirect to the parent company but I can't even confirm the existence of this name. Article topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. (?) It had zero hits in a video game reliable sources custom Google search. There are no worthwhile redirect targets. Please ping me you find more (non-English and offline) sources. – czar 13:41, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Parent company is PF Magic --TKK! bark with me! 15:53, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, but there aren't enough sources to justify even that. – czar 16:18, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Software article of unclear notability. I'm not sure if this is a fan-made expansion/mod or a hoax, but if it were an official product, there would at least be some incidental mention on the web connecting it to PF Magic.Dialectric (talk) 17:04, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.