Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrick Lee
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. - Mailer Diablo 12:50, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Doesn't seem to be notable enough. Delete. --Nlu (talk) 21:25, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, few indications of notability, few exhibitions. Punkmorten 07:08, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep There are NO contemporary Taiwanese painters on Wikipedia - At least give one a chance. 14:25, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. While I don't feel Patrick Lee is the most notable person in the world, his artwork has at least been featured in the Taipei Times within the last two years. I'm not sure I see the harm in having the article (although it could use some sprucing up to expand it beyond its stub status). Inclusion of his past exhibition dates, most memorable works of art, and a more detailed description of his work's themes would vastly improve the stub. ju66l3r 18:21, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 19:45, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Doesn't appear to meet WP:BIO. Even the "keep" recommendations don't seem too convinced. -AED 20:53, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I am convinced. No harm in having an article for him. Attic Owl 13:25, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep seems to have some notability in Taiwan --RMHED 15:43, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep due to some expressed notability within Taiwan. Yamaguchi先生 21:32, 8 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.