Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Hume (game designer)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 03:45, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Hume (game designer)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

no sign of notability - unreferenced Tracer9999 (talk) 16:33, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 16:31, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 16:31, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk). — Frankie (talk) 16:32, 10 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 15:35, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I understand that the RPG project has difficulty establishing notability, but growth has to come from the major RPG topics outward. I PROD'd several of Hume's linked projects because after multiple searches, there is little cause to keep them up by WP:GNG. If Hume has any notability, it is as a creator in Shadowrun, but his involvement in it and the industry is not notable enough on its own to warrant its own article, especially for a BLP. I'd consider a redirect, but even still, I'm unconvinced of the necessity since this stub has stayed a stub for so long. czar · · 19:35, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - nothing in google news and only a handful of very minor mentions (no substance to build an article) in google books. SalHamton (talk) 01:15, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.