Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prashant Bhargava
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Tone 16:14, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Prashant Bhargava (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
fails WP:BIO and WP:CREATIVE. mainly passing mentions in gnews [1]. don't think the 1 film Sangam is enough to get him over the line. LibStar (talk) 23:18, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:27, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and expand per meeting WP:BIO and WP:GNG. There is enough in Google News to expand and source this article. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 23:55, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep It's within the scope of WP:BIO and WP:FILMBIO Eveswing (talk) 13:19, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Timotheus Canens (talk) 00:06, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and expand; his film Sangam does not have a page yet, but it would appear to be noteworthy, and once that page is written this one will be easy. Edward Vielmetti (talk) 06:35, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.