Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prefetch buffer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Dynamic random-access memory. Nakon 03:04, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Prefetch buffer

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced since January 2010. Subject has no coverage outside of pages primarily discussing Prefetching or organizations that create and promote their versions of prefetch buffers. Mr. Guye (talk) 21:47, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Mr. Guye (talk) 21:51, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Checked history and talk page, no sources attempted. Delete.-A Wild Abigail Appears! _{Capture me.} _Moves. 17:10, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:10, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Looks like WP:SNOW. It's exactly the sort of technical subject one would expect to find in Wikipedia. Googling "Prefetch buffer" (with quotes) gives 29 in news, 1,930 in books and 56,000 generally. Clearly meets WP:GNG. There's an equivalent article in fr.wikipedia and 10 "What links here" articles. -Arb. (talk) 23:30, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Selective merge and redirect to Dynamic random-access memory. I doubt that much of what is here can be sourced, and it would be better discussed as part of the memory that it's used in. --Michig (talk) 07:59, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:46, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Selective merge and redirect. I agree with Michig, above. Neutrality^talk 23:42, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.