Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quench Zine
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Wizardman 15:05, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Quench Zine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Delete: Fails WP:RS and WP:N. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 00:23, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No real claim in article of meeting WP:N; first several pages of non-wiki ghits aren't showing a whiff of notability. WP:COI issues don't help the case.--Fabrictramp (talk) 00:26, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Doesn't appear that there are refs good enough to meet WP:N. There is a single source on the page, but it's not third party. --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 00:32, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Also: "Tagging anything other than attack pages or complete nonsense a minute after creation is not constructive and only serves to annoy the page author." please do not bite the newcomers — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.15.43.159 (talk • contribs)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- Wisdom89 (T / C) 04:49, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - There is no policy or guideline that prevents users from tagging an article for deletion due to "time" if it clearly fits the criteria. A1, A3 and A7 at WP:CSD for example. Wisdom89 (T / C) 04:52, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.