Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Regency Mall (Racine)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn, sources have been added to the article and a clear consensus for keeping was made. Non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 19:02, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regency Mall (Racine)

sub-stub-class page on a mall that seems to fail WP:RS, seeing as I could find no reliable sources on it. Page has stayed mostly the same since January. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 04:05, 17 December 2007 (UTC) Withdrawn per sources added. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 19:02, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malls-related deletions. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 04:05, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep A major super-regional mall with more than 1 million square feet of leasable space, and "about 370" sources on a Google News Archive Search using "Regency Mall" Racine, with reliable sources added to the article, would all seem to satisfy the Wikipedia:Notability standard. It's rather hard to understand the complete inability to find a single reliable source. Alansohn (talk) 04:45, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - super-regionals are notable. I tend to agree with Alansohn about your search methods. As an aside, please stop nominating 11 Malls in 1 day. Exit2DOS2000^•T•C• 04:58, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Alansohn . --brew crewer (yada, yada) 05:36, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Alansohn. Maxa megalon 2000 06:08, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.