Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scotton
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was KEEP the rewritten version, withdrawn by nominator. Pilatus 02:20, 28 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
My first thought when I saw this was "Oh, for fxxx's sake." The entire text of this thing which cannot even be dignified with the name "stub" is Scotton is a place. Well, so are the Democratic Republic of Congo, Peoria, and the crater Tycho, but at least someone has written something about them. Grutness...wha? 01:07, 28 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- keep the dab page. Thanks Hahnchen. Grutness...wha? 01:50, 28 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Can't that be speedily deleted under A1, "no context"? The name Scotton is farless intriguing than Haddersfield in Jamaica. Pilatus 01:21, 28 September 2005 (UTC)Keep now. Pilatus 02:15, 28 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]- Comment: Its a place in Lincolnshire, which I found on List of places in Lincolnshire. I added that to the page, and removed the speedy tag. Now we should probably decide if its notable, but if its not someone should deal with all the redlinks at List of places in Lincolnshire so that it isn't recreated by some well meaning person. --best, kevin ···Kzollman | Talk··· 01:36, 28 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Changed it to disambig, Google maps says theres 3 of em in the UK. I'm sure at least one of them will be worth keeping. - Hahnchen 01:47, 28 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.