Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shahidayit-e Shandak

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎. Liz Read! Talk! 23:18, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Shahidayit-e Shandak (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:GNG and WP:PLACEOUTCOMES. It's a different excel file now but still not notable. Hongsy (talk) 14:41, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: Reference #1 is the official Census of Iran. If a town is listed on their spreadsheet for this region (#11 in this case), then it's officially recognized per WP:GEOLAND and therefore notable. @Hongsy, is Ganj Konar listed? Checking references is part of WP:BEFORE.
Thanks,
--A. B. (talkcontribsglobal count) 17:30, 28 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - Whilst simply being an abadi does not give a pass of WP:GEOLAND, in this case the population is large enough that the abadi should have been converted into a proper village. The issue is that even if this happened, it may not have this name (the name apparently translates as "You are martyred" according to Google Translate, though I wouldn't necessarily read too much into this). Looking at the table, it actually does not include an exact match for this village-name, but line 1390 includes 'شهيدايت شندك which I understand is similar in sound/meaning and has the same number of people/families as in the article. Personally I'd lean towards just redirecting this to Gowhar Kuh Rural District per WP:NOPAGE since there might at some point actually be a real article about a real village here. FOARP (talk) 10:32, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 17:19, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. It is a notable place (WP:GEOLAND)
बिनोद थारू (talk) 02:34, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 11:36, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:07, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.