Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skyservice destinations

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:27, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Skyservice destinations

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

(1) This unreferenced article fails WP:V. A WP:BEFORE search turns up nothing reliable.
(2) The main article Skyservice describes the operation as primarily charter, therefore a list of destinations is not meaningful, unless a list of destinations to which it offered tickets is proffered. Rhadow (talk) 12:45, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Discuss 12:55, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Discuss 12:55, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or Merge without prejudice. The only destination article I can find for this defunct airline is here, and that's after some searching: [1] It does appear as if it offered tickets to Belgrade, though. If better historical sources are available, I wouldn't be opposed to seeing this article recreated, but I doubt that will happen. Probably best included in the airline's main article as prose. SportingFlyer (talk) 00:56, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:01, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:01, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Charter airlines do not offer a significant enough level of service to partiuclar destinations to justify an article like this. BillHPike (talk, contribs) 04:52, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.