Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/So i herd u like mudkips

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Flower party? 01:28, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

So i herd u like mudkips

Non-notable and unverifiable internet meme Stifle 12:37, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I feel that it is notable. On other websites all over, I have seen users saying "So i herd u like..." whatever. Maybe we should just change the title to "So i herd u like" b/c they don't always use "mudkips". But mudkips was the origin. So basically, if this should be deleted for that reason than O RLY? should be deleted at well. If I must do more research and find stuff, I will. But first, try Google searching "So i herd u like" (keep the quotes). You'll find a lot of stuff, about the MudKipClub too. But if it still doesn't seem notable, is there anywhere I can add this to another article about Internet memes and phrases? I don't know if Internet phenomenon will work, I don't know if it will fit in the quotes section or anything, and deviantART won't work... if there is any where that it will fit elsewhere in Wikipedia, I will gladly surrender the article. Or make it a redirect. Matty-chan 13:07, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I'm a longstanding DeviantART member, and I've never "herd" of this. The associated DevART account, MudKipClub, has just 2,527 pageviews (for comparison's sake, my account has over 22,000+). The phrase gets just 147 unique Google hits, and most of that very modest number are all from the same site (not even DeviantART, but a belgian site). Doesn't seem widespread or well-known, either on or off DeviantART. And then there's verifiability to consider... Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 13:27, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. PJM 13:36, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nowhere near notable, even for DeviantART -- Astrokey44|talk 13:49, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - barely qualifies as an Internet meme, let alone an "Internet phenomenon". --Canley 14:19, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete all internet memes. Just zis Guy you know? 16:01, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Andrew; I've never seen this on deviantART myself. I'm sure it has a place on WikiIlliterate though. RGTraynor 16:09, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and all above. And this one time...!? At deviantART...!? I made something up one day! Шизомби 17:11, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
So i herd u don't like forumcruft. Delete per Starblind. --E lkman - ^(talk) 17:17, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
D L337 non-notable meme.--Isotope23 18:21, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep. I've seen it around a few places, if it's worth anything. Eh. -Rmzy717 AT SCHOOL 19:06, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not actually a meme ⇒ SWATJester ^Ready Aim _Fire! 00:08, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per the debate on the pro-meme policy that someone recently suggested. Deizio 00:23, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 02:32, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per Starblind. I would have gone with a merge and redirect to Mudkip but research shows that this is not worth even of that inclusion. Personally had I come across this article that's what I would have done right away, as a matter of fact.--Sean Black ^(talk) 05:43, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per User:Starblind --LBMixPro ^<Sp ^e ^ak|on|it!> 07:48, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Influential and famous memes might be encyclopedic, but non-notable meme of a few people butchering the English language consistently is not encyclopedic. --Wingsandsword 04:27, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Wikipedia is not really the place for this. Sadly, people will come here looking for it. While it isn't unverifiable or original research it is still fails WP:V. I prefer Gardevoir anyways. Kotepho 11:55, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom Tyhopho 13:27, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.