Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steward
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Keep. --Titoxd(?!? - did you read this?) 02:31, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
This dab page was marked for cleanup. In attempting to perform said cleanup, I realized that not a single entry on the page meets the requirements of Wikipedia:Manual of Style (disambiguation pages), so by the time I was done cleaning it up, there would be nothing left. Therefore, I bring it here for consideration of deletion. --RoySmith 23:55, 25 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, enables users to find flight attendant, majordomo, etc. Would be constantly recreated if deleted. Kappa 00:21, 26 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Useful navigation. CanadianCaesar 00:38, 26 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Each of the listed articles would invidually merit a redirect from steward, making this an obvious common-sense case for disambiguation. The manual of style is not a straitjacket. —Cryptic (talk) 00:41, 26 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Highly useful. Jacqui★ 15:21, 26 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as per previous users. Sarah Ewart 02:19, 27 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- I see this was not the most popular of AfD's :-) I've done the cleanup, and at this point suggest this AfD be considered moot. --RoySmith 02:37, 27 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, as it is an useful disambiguation page. Carioca 23:55, 27 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.