Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Talview

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 16:04, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Talview

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not seeing any significant coverage in reliable sources to satisfy CORPDEPTH. I could only find trivial coverage such as fundraising, interviews and press releases. M4DU7 (talk) 09:17, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. M4DU7 (talk) 09:17, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. M4DU7 (talk) 09:17, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. M4DU7 (talk) 09:17, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. M4DU7 (talk) 09:17, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination, textbook case of not making an encyclopedic article as outlined at WP:ORGCRIT, especially the part that talks about standard notices, brief announcements, and routine coverage. - Bri.public (talk) 20:09, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: An article by a briefly active editor which has attracted subsequent promotional WP:SPA edits. Although they've been around for a number of years (apparently as long ago as 2012) Talview still seem to appear in start-up coverage such as this (March 2020). Searches find sporadic announcement-based items, which falls under trivial coverage at WP:CORPDEPTH, but I am not seeing the WP:RS coverage needed to demonstrate attained notability. AllyD (talk) 07:42, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.