Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Apprentice (U.S. season 10)
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. May be recreated when there are reliable sources. SilkTork *YES! 23:21, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The Apprentice (U.S. season 10) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
WP:CRYSTAL. We have no information on it other than the fact that it is going to start casting soon. Delete, with (of course) no problem with a recreation should more information become available. The fact that casting hasn't even started yet suggests that information won't become available for quite some time. Ironholds (talk) 11:47, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Nom says it all. - 2 ... says you, says me, suggestion box 15:28, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Um, I'm not even seeing evidence that it is casting... the cited reference page doesn't have a listing for The Apprentice on it, and all I'm finding as far as renewal is the next celebrity one. In any case, without an official announcement it's pure WP:CRYSTAL. BryanG (talk) 21:33, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Addendum following the addition of this link: proves absolutely nothing, could easily have an explanation as simple as prewritten copy such as that in some of List of premature obituaries. It's just speculation, and we're jumping the gun by posting this now. No objections to recreation with an official announcement, of course. BryanG (talk) 20:58, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- My Magic 8 Ball says... you're fired. -Atmoz (talk) 21:41, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - per nom. Rlendog (talk) 02:08, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep if properly sourced. The Apprentice is a noteworthy subject and if there is even 1 link to support this story it should be left alone. Anber (talk) 07:59, 11 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.