Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Big Blue Book of Bicycle Repair
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:43, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The Big Blue Book of Bicycle Repair (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Delete. Non-notable book. Bordering on spam. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 07:37, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: I created this article to resolve a dispute over “Big Blue Book”. I have little idea whether The Big Blue Book of Bicycle Repair is really note-worthy. I will notify the editor whose content was cloned to make this article of the nomination. —SlamDiego←T 07:53, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I have redirected Big Blue Book to Little Blue Book since it was a one sentence sub. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 08:22, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- It was originally a redirect (pending expansion), and that helped to foster confusion (as “Big Blue Book” was mistaken for itself a confusion for “Little Blue Book”). It also is not as encouraging to editors who might potentially expand the article to a full discussion of the Big Blue Books. —SlamDiego←T 09:27, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I have put the Big Blue Book up for deletion as well. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Big Blue Book. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 06:12, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- A poor choice of nominees, and I don't know why you have us discussing it here. —SlamDiego←T 06:31, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I have put the Big Blue Book up for deletion as well. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Big Blue Book. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 06:12, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- It was originally a redirect (pending expansion), and that helped to foster confusion (as “Big Blue Book” was mistaken for itself a confusion for “Little Blue Book”). It also is not as encouraging to editors who might potentially expand the article to a full discussion of the Big Blue Books. —SlamDiego←T 09:27, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.