Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Cryptoverse

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Joyous! Noise! 20:44, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Cryptoverse

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Zero mentions in RS. The first Bloomberg site looks fishy, due to the font and the mention that it's published by a PR company copyright down at the bottom. Rest of the sourcing is of zero importance for notability, a combination of PR and non-RS. Oaktree b (talk) 20:16, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. Oaktree b (talk) 20:16, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I agree that this is not notable. Crypto companies have a strong motive to create a Wikipedia page for apparent credibility despite lack of notability.

Chamaemelum (talk) 20:23, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Cryptocurrency, Companies, and United Arab Emirates. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:27, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - this is a G11. some of the sources appear to be dubious paid promotional blogs pretending to be news outlets. I removed those and the press releases and the coverage is one Bloomberg article, which doesn't mention the article topic - David Gerard (talk) 08:43, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Failed notability requirement. Crypto platforms are quite notorious in trying to be included in Wikipedia. Noneate (talk) 14:50, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Very short, not notable in any way, and possibly promotional content. HarukaAmaranth (talk) 13:42, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.