Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Liquid Fire
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 00:48, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The Liquid Fire (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Unsigned band, the members aged 19-20. Does not meet any criteria in WP:MUSIC. Punkmorten (talk) 09:18, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- How is the age of the band members relevant? I can name at least three younger people who are notable despite their age. - Mgm|(talk) 11:21, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete for falling well, well short of WP:MUSIC. If any of the voluminous content could be sourced at all then maybe this could be reconsidered, but at the mo it's just another history of another school band. onebravemonkey 10:57, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, fails WP:MUSIC with only a solitary album. Blackmetalbaz (talk) 11:19, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete for same reasons mentioned above. Dream Focus (talk) 12:52, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Large article, lots of information, well formatted, but it still fails all aspects of WP:MUSIC. A single album is not enough to confer notability. This means the band is not notable, as no third party coverage, awards, major tours, etc. Fails guidelines. Theseeker4 (talk) 18:28, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete G4 - Recreation of deleted material [1]. Esradekan Gibb "Talk" 03:31, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete--nice timeline, but no notability. One album, one single, that's not enough. Drmies (talk) 23:27, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.