Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Little Lake Bryan Company
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Titoxd(?!? - help us) 00:11, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not notable for anything other than being managing Walt Disney land. Librarianofages 02:50, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Non-notable. Nothing relevant on a quick gsearch. Mystache 03:02, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Walt Disney Company, as it is a minor subsidiary of the Walt Disney Company--TBC☆O M G! 03:05, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, it is not worthy of mentioning in the grandiose Walt Disney Company article, thus it should be kept to its own. Sherurcij (talk) (Terrorist Wikiproject) 03:41, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, nn company, doesn't meets WP:CORP. --Terence Ong 04:03, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, non-notable company. Probably shouldn't redirect to anything per Wikipedia:Redirect#What_needs_to_be_done_on_pages_that_are_targets_of_redirects.3F. EWS23 | (Leave me a message!) 19:12, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete - I smell a hoax. Has anybody looked at the userpage of the original poster? User:SPUI. -Ekajati 01:43, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Unless a better reason is given, this "vote" should be ignored. --SPUI (T - C - RFC - Curpsbot problems) 08:33, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - if it's not worth mentioning in a Disney article, it's not worth its own article. --Ajdz 05:16, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep or merge to Walt Disney World. I can provide sources if necessary - this is "notable" as an arm of the Walt Disney Company. --SPUI (T - C - RFC - Curpsbot problems) 08:31, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.