Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Monkey King's Daughter

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus has leaned towards keep since references were added - regards, Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 02:07, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Monkey King's Daughter

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a book that does not receive significant coverage to have an article included in the encyclopedia. —Duncan (that's me!)^{What I Do} / _{What I Say} 02:48, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Insufficient notability ie. substantial coverage in reliable independent sources to meet Wikipedia guidelines. ChildofMidnight (talk) 20:18, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence from third-party sources the author, let alone series, is notability. --EEMIV (talk) 23:43, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Seems notable enough. I have cleaned up the article a little. Colonel Warden (talk) 13:50, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I added some refs. Discussed, albiet brifly, in multiple independant reliable sources. DES ^(talk) 22:20, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. This is somewhat borderline but I am leaning towards keep with the new sources added. JBsupreme (talk) 20:58, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep - the added refs in the article now would persuade me to keep. Cocytus [»talk«] 01:32, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.