Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Queen Victoria

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Queen Vic Fire Week. asilvering (talk) 18:37, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Queen Victoria

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable fork of Queen Vic Fire Week, which has more and better sources. Coverage of this location is incidental to the other article, leaving this article as filled with unsourced material and failing WP:GNG. Jontesta (talk) 15:39, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Jontesta (talk) 15:39, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 16:13, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Queen Vic Fire Week as a fork. The other article is in much better shape, and there isn't WP:SIGCOV for separate topics. Shooterwalker (talk) 15:23, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.