Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Third Half
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy deleted. Mailer Diablo 08:21, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable forum with only a few active members and an Alexa rank of 146,731. This forum is part of The Dugout, so maybe some of it could be merged into that article. Schzmo 02:08, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, fails WP:WEB Alphachimp talk 05:27, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Alphachimp. Almost certainly is original research, to boot.--Chaser T 07:50, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Objection If it needs to be merged then do so. Was only seperated as a means to keep seperate content apart from The Dugout which I believed had no relevance to the original site. Would like to point out that the research is based upon original forum sources and archives and as such I am (for all intents and purposes) the "Expert Editor". I am also in the process of sandboxing additional content for the entire piece including relevant archive materials and publications. No we've not (as a totality) been published by any reliable source, but then we're also not putting forward crackpot science ideas based on "Original Research". Individual contributions and members have however been published. Also somewhat object to the insertion of the Alexa stamp as if that actually counts for anything because as per Wiki's "Importance Criteria" the piece does not need to be qualified by popularity just because it is obscure information of relevance to 'few'. Cheers.--Koncorde 20:05, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- I have removed said article until such time as I can put up the content in its entireity rather than have it be judged on current content.--Koncorde 20:12, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete per above. Bad decision on blanking the page. Zos 04:13, 10 July 2006 (UTC) Zos 03:20, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Blanking the page is essentially {{db-author}} for an AfD that could be speedy closed. We can always review this again later should Koncorde choose to repost it.--Chaser T 03:33, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.